<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Redis on Brave New Geek</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/tag/redis/</link><description>Recent content in Redis on Brave New Geek</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:05:18 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bravenewgeek.com/tag/redis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Benchmarking Message Queue Latency</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/benchmarking-message-queue-latency/</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:23:39 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/benchmarking-message-queue-latency/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;About a year and a half ago, I published &lt;a href="https://bravenewgeek.com/dissecting-message-queues/"&gt;Dissecting Message Queues&lt;/a&gt;, which broke down a few different messaging systems and did some performance benchmarking. It was a naive attempt and had &lt;a href="https://bravenewgeek.com/benchmark-responsibly/"&gt;a lot of problems&lt;/a&gt;, but it was also my first time doing any kind of system benchmarking. It turns out benchmarking systems correctly is actually pretty difficult and many folks get it wrong. I don’t claim to have gotten it right, but over the past year and a half I’ve learned a lot, tried to build some better tools, and improve my methodology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Not Invented Here</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/not-invented-here/</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:17:52 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/not-invented-here/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Engineers love engineering things. The reason is self-evident (and maybe self-fulfilling—why else would you be an engineer?). We like to think we’re pretty good at solving problems. Unfortunately, this mindset can, on occasion, yield undesirable consequences which might not be immediately apparent but all the while damaging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Developers are all in tune with the idea of “don’t reinvent the wheel,” but it seems to be eschewed sometimes, deliberately or otherwise. People don’t generally write their own merge sort, so why would they write their own consensus protocol? Anecdotally speaking, &lt;a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msg/redis-db/Oazt2k7Lzz4/MPhvXVizCAYJ"&gt;they do&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dissecting Message Queues</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/dissecting-message-queues/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:33:53 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/dissecting-message-queues/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Disclaimer (10/29/20)&lt;/strong&gt; – The benchmarks and performance analysis presented in this post should not be relied on. This post was written roughly six years ago, and at the time, was just the result of my exploration of various messaging systems. The benchmarks are not implemented in a meaningful way, which I discussed in a &lt;a href="https://bravenewgeek.com/benchmark-responsibly/"&gt;follow-up post&lt;/a&gt;. This post will remain for posterity and learning purposes, but I do not claim that this information is accurate or useful.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Real-Time Client Notifications Using Redis and Socket.IO</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/real-time-client-notifications-using-redis-and-socket-io/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 19:18:33 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/real-time-client-notifications-using-redis-and-socket-io/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Backbone.js is great for building structured client-side applications. Its declarative event-handling makes it easy to listen for actions in the UI and keep your data model in sync, but what about changes that occur to your data model on the server? Coordinating user interfaces for data consistency isn’t a trivial problem. Take a simple example: users A and B are viewing the same data at the same time, while user A makes a change to that data. How do we propagate those changes to user B? Now, how do we do it at scale, say, several thousand concurrent users? What about external consumers of that data?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>