<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>I-Confluence on Brave New Geek</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/tag/i-confluence/</link><description>Recent content in I-Confluence on Brave New Geek</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:32:34 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bravenewgeek.com/tag/i-confluence/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>From the Ground Up: Reasoning About Distributed Systems in the Real World</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/from-the-ground-up-reasoning-about-distributed-systems-in-the-real-world/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:26:50 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/from-the-ground-up-reasoning-about-distributed-systems-in-the-real-world/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The rabbit hole is deep. Down and down it goes. Where it ends, nobody knows. But as we traverse it, patterns appear. They give us hope, they quell the fear.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Distributed systems literature is abundant, but as a practitioner, I often find it difficult to know where to start or how to synthesize this knowledge without a more formal background. This is a non-academic’s attempt to provide a line of thought for rationalizing design decisions. This piece doesn’t necessarily contribute any new ideas but rather tries to provide a holistic framework by studying some influential existing ones. It includes references which provide a good starting point for thinking about distributed systems. Specifically, we look at a few formal results and slightly less formal design principles to provide a basis from which we can argue about system design.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>