<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Cloud Run on Brave New Geek</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/tag/cloud-run/</link><description>Recent content in Cloud Run on Brave New Geek</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:58:13 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bravenewgeek.com/tag/cloud-run/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cloud without Kubernetes</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/cloud-without-kubernetes/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:58:13 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/cloud-without-kubernetes/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://bravenewgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Kubernetes-or-Cloud-Run-1024x683.jpeg"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think it’s safe to say Kubernetes has “won” the cloud mindshare game. If you look at the CNCF &lt;a href="https://landscape.cncf.io/"&gt;Cloud Native landscape&lt;/a&gt; (and manage to not go cross eyed), it seems like most of the projects are somehow related to Kubernetes. KubeCon is one of the fastest-growing industry events. Companies we talk to at Real Kinetic who are either preparing for or currently executing migrations to the cloud are centering their strategies around Kubernetes. Those already in the cloud are investing heavily in platform-izing their Kubernetes environment. Kubernetes competitors like Nomad, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, OpenShift, and Rancher have sort of just faded to the background (or simply pivoted to Kubernetes). In many ways, “cloud native” seems to be equated with “Kubernetes”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What’s Going on with GKE and Anthos?</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/whats-going-on-with-gke-and-anthos/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:12:52 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/whats-going-on-with-gke-and-anthos/</guid><description>&lt;h4 id="gcps-slippery-slide-into-enterprise"&gt;GCP’s Slippery Slide into Enterprise&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When former Oracle exec Thomas Kurian took over for Diane Greene as Google Cloud’s CEO, a lot of people expressed concern about what this meant for the future of GCP. Vendor lock-in is already at the forefront of the minds of many cloud adopters, and Oracle is notorious for &lt;a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/19/amazon-aws-chief-andy-jassy-on-oracle-customers-are-sick-of-it.html"&gt;locking customers into expensive and prolonged contracts&lt;/a&gt;. However, I thought the move was smart on Google’s part.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Serverless on GCP</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/serverless-on-gcp/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:04:48 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/serverless-on-gcp/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like many other marketing buzzwords, the concept of “serverless” has taken on a life of its own, which can make it difficult to understand what serverless actually &lt;em&gt;means&lt;/em&gt;. What it really means is that the cloud provider fully manages server infrastructure all the way up to the application layer. For example, GCE isn’t serverless because, while Google manages the &lt;em&gt;physical&lt;/em&gt; server infrastructure, we still have to deal with patching operating systems, managing load balancers, configuring firewall rules, and so on. Serverless means we merely worry about our application code and business logic and nothing else. This concept extends beyond pure compute though, including things like databases, message queues, stream processing, machine learning, and other types of systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>