<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Anthos on Brave New Geek</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/tag/anthos/</link><description>Recent content in Anthos on Brave New Geek</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:12:52 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bravenewgeek.com/tag/anthos/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What’s Going on with GKE and Anthos?</title><link>https://bravenewgeek.com/whats-going-on-with-gke-and-anthos/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:12:52 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://bravenewgeek.com/whats-going-on-with-gke-and-anthos/</guid><description>&lt;h4 id="gcps-slippery-slide-into-enterprise"&gt;GCP’s Slippery Slide into Enterprise&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When former Oracle exec Thomas Kurian took over for Diane Greene as Google Cloud’s CEO, a lot of people expressed concern about what this meant for the future of GCP. Vendor lock-in is already at the forefront of the minds of many cloud adopters, and Oracle is notorious for &lt;a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/19/amazon-aws-chief-andy-jassy-on-oracle-customers-are-sick-of-it.html"&gt;locking customers into expensive and prolonged contracts&lt;/a&gt;. However, I thought the move was smart on Google’s part.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>